Police & Crime Commissioner Election 2016

Comment on policing and law & order issues

Will you be voting in the PCC Election 2016?

Yes
3
20%
No
10
67%
Undecided
2
13%
 
Total votes : 15

Re: Police & Crime Commissioner Election 2016

Postby Damo5 » Mon 09 May 2016 1:09 pm

The other issue is that I suspect that many of those who do vote, do so purly on 'party' lines
Now if the ballot paper did not list the party of each candidate was representing it would be more interesting and fairer.

Incidently i think the same should apply for most local elections
User avatar
Damo5
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon 25 Nov 2013 1:59 pm

Re: Police & Crime Commissioner Election 2016

Postby IGS » Mon 09 May 2016 5:39 pm

Exciting, wasn't it. For those who give a s*** the Cons held it.
User avatar
IGS
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue 09 Jun 2009 12:00 am
Location:

Re: Police & Crime Commissioner Election 2016

Postby trev » Mon 09 May 2016 7:12 pm

I think the whole thing is a farce! The police is a necessary emergency service that is not (or should not) be restricted or directed by politics! The figureheads of each force are just like the CEO of a company - responsible and accountable for running the force in the best way possible. Yes they are hampered by government budgets, limits, rules, etc., but why should they directed by any political party? Public safety should be the same whoever is in government.

Why this election is necessary at all is beyond me!
trev
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue 10 Dec 2013 7:14 am

Re: Police & Crime Commissioner Election 2016

Postby Pat-H » Mon 09 May 2016 7:18 pm

Lets not kid ourselves that the police have been non politically controlled for many years now.
Under Thatcher the Police were used as a tool of government policy and once that had been achieved there was no going back.
The police need funds and those funds are Government controlled.
The PCC makes little difference to this it's just a way to create another bureaucratic high paying job. (ok I know to some £85K isn't high paying. But what does this person really do that warrants that sort of salary. What risks do they take? what consequences of making bad choices?)
User avatar
Pat-H
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu 19 Apr 2007 12:00 am
Location: Ware

Re: Police & Crime Commissioner Election 2016

Postby Ian » Wed 11 May 2016 8:59 pm

Well, in the end I was one of the 29% that turned out to vote. I'm assuming that the 71% who didn't vote are happy ith the result.
Ian
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Thu 21 Nov 2013 10:39 am

Re: Police & Crime Commissioner Election 2016

Postby Steve » Wed 11 May 2016 11:26 pm

Ian wrote:Well, in the end I was one of the 29% that turned out to vote. I'm assuming that the 71% who didn't vote are happy ith the result.

Making assumptions is unwise.

There will be those who didn't vote because none of the candidates appealed to them.
There will be those who didn't vote because they disagree with the principle of elected PCCs.
There will be those who didn't vote because the only candidates standing were those put up by political parties.
User avatar
Steve
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Fri 08 Nov 2013 5:39 pm
Location: Hertford

Re: Police & Crime Commissioner Election 2016

Postby Mel » Thu 12 May 2016 5:38 am

In the first election for the pcc (or pacman as I call it!) I did go down and spoilt the ballot paper because I didn't agree with the election. Waste of money and an appointment like this as others have said should be a non-political one. However, it looks as though they are here to stay for now so I did vote properly this time. It's the only voice we've got so we should' use it or lose it'.
User avatar
Mel
 
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat 24 Jan 2004 12:00 am
Location: Ware

Re: Police & Crime Commissioner Election 2016

Postby Pat-H » Thu 12 May 2016 10:11 am

Steve wrote:
Ian wrote:Well, in the end I was one of the 29% that turned out to vote. I'm assuming that the 71% who didn't vote are happy ith the result.

Making assumptions is unwise.

There will be those who didn't vote because none of the candidates appealed to them.
There will be those who didn't vote because they disagree with the principle of elected PCCs.
There will be those who didn't vote because the only candidates standing were those put up by political parties.


For all the above reasons a person could still have attended the voting station and spoilt their ballot as such actions are also recorded.

The most likely reason is that it meant getting up off the sofa and missing a trashy soap and its easier to let other people worry about such things.
I like the other 29% made my view known. And really its a 15 minute walk or less. Its not exactly hard work.
User avatar
Pat-H
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu 19 Apr 2007 12:00 am
Location: Ware

Re: Police & Crime Commissioner Election 2016

Postby VicarageRoader » Thu 12 May 2016 10:22 am

Pat-H wrote:Lets not kid ourselves that the police have been non politically controlled for many years now.
Under Thatcher the Police were used as a tool of government policy and once that had been achieved there was no going back.
The police need funds and those funds are Government controlled.
The PCC makes little difference to this it's just a way to create another bureaucratic high paying job. (ok I know to some £85K isn't high paying. But what does this person really do that warrants that sort of salary. What risks do they take? what consequences of making bad choices?)


If people had checked the bios for the candidate, they'd have seen the Labour guy wasn't going to take the salary. He was willing to do the job for what the Government laughingly refer to as the 'Living Wage'. 
VicarageRoader
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu 08 Jun 2006 12:00 am
Location: Ware

Re: Police & Crime Commissioner Election 2016

Postby Pat-H » Thu 12 May 2016 10:37 am

VicarageRoader wrote:
Pat-H wrote:Lets not kid ourselves that the police have been non politically controlled for many years now.
Under Thatcher the Police were used as a tool of government policy and once that had been achieved there was no going back.
The police need funds and those funds are Government controlled.
The PCC makes little difference to this it's just a way to create another bureaucratic high paying job. (ok I know to some £85K isn't high paying. But what does this person really do that warrants that sort of salary. What risks do they take? what consequences of making bad choices?)


If people had checked the bios for the candidate, they'd have seen the Labour guy wasn't going to take the salary. He was willing to do the job for what the Government laughingly refer to as the 'Living Wage'. 


If I stood I'd take the salary and donate it to the South Maltings to more than cover a full time wage there.
User avatar
Pat-H
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu 19 Apr 2007 12:00 am
Location: Ware

PreviousNext

Return to Policing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron